How to spot a fake vendor review
Six patterns that separate a real review from a purchased one — and why the fixes most platforms apply do not work.
Almost no marketplace explains its algorithm. Here is our reasoning for doing the opposite.
The standard argument against publishing ranking rules is that people will game them. It is a real risk, and it is also a convenient excuse for the much more common reason: the rules would embarrass the platform if anyone read them.
If position is decided by advertising spend, publishing that is bad for business. If it is decided by verified work, publishing it is the best marketing available.
We publish the factors and their relative weight: host reviews and reliability matter most, peer endorsements and verified events next, badges and recency after that. We do not publish the exact formula, because that is the part that would be gamed rather than understood.
The practical consequence is that there is no shortcut. The only route to a higher position is doing real, consistent, reliable work at real events — which is the outcome we wanted the incentives to produce.
Six patterns that separate a real review from a purchased one — and why the fixes most platforms apply do not work.
The ones that surface problems early, taken from disputes we have actually had to resolve.
Five verified events changes the shape of your inbound. Here is what shifts, and why.
Every professional in the directory has been vetted, and every review is attached to a confirmed event.